Jest vs Mocha: The Best JavaScript Testing Framework for Unit Testing

Before diving deep into the comparison between Jest vs Mocha, let’s go back to the beginning. As you know, unit testing is a software testing method that verifies the correctness of an application’s individual components.

It helps catch bugs early, keeps your code stable, and ensures that small changes don’t break existing functionality. Since unit tests are easy and quick to run, it isn’t surprising that developers rely on them throughout the coding phase to validate their work before moving forward.

However, choosing the proper testing framework is as important as writing the unit tests. Ultimately, you want something fast, reliable, and easy to set up, providing clear, actionable feedback when tests fail.

Jest and Mocha are two of the most popular testing frameworks in the JavaScript ecosystem. While both serve the same purpose, they differ significantly in design, setup, and usage.

In this blog post, we’ll thoroughly compare Jest vs Mocha, including their features, challenges, and test scenarios. By the end, you’ll know which framework to choose for your unit testing needs. Let’s get started.

Everything to Know About Jest

What is Jest?

Jest is a JavaScript testing framework developed by Meta. Initially optimized for React applications, it has since expanded to support testing Babel, TypeScript, Node.js, Angular, and other JavaScript projects.

It aims to provide a zero-config testing experience, which means it requires minimal setup, and you can get started with testing quickly.

Jest features

• Provides a robust framework to mock function’s return values to suit your test cases, simulating return values from functions
• Creates a copy of the produced HTML file and tests if the current version matches that of the previous snapshot
• Parallelizes tests by running them in their processes to maximize performance
• Collects code coverage information from entire projects, including untested files
• Replaces functions, modules, or timers easily with its mocking and spying tools
• Writes test conditions without extra dependencies using its assertion library
• Works seamlessly with Promises, async/await, and callback-based code

Best test scenarios for Jest

Over time, Jest has gained prominence in testing front-end applications, full-stack interactions, and utility functions. Let’s explore some of its test scenarios:

1. API call mocking

Use Jest’s built-in mocking capabilities to test functions that rely on external APIs or services. Instead of making actual API calls, simulate responses and test how your app handles different scenarios. Verify whether your code correctly processes data, handles errors gracefully, and doesn’t fail unexpectedly when an API is down.

2. State management testing

When working with a state management library, you must confirm that actions and reducers (or mutations) update the state correctly. Jest simplifies validating whether your state transitions happen as expected when different actions are triggered. Ensure your app’s logic remains unpredictable and maintainable.

3. Time-sensitive code simulations

If your app includes time-based features like polling mechanisms, scheduled notifications, or animations, use Jest’s timer mocks to control and simulate the passage of time in your tests. Evaluate your code’s behavior after delays or repeated intervals without waiting for real-time execution.

Jest challenges

• Parallel execution can lead to high memory usage, making the unit testing framework slower for very large test suites
• It lacks full support for ECMAScript Modules (ESM), the official approach to JavaScript module management
• Its opinionated nature makes it harder to swap out components like test runners or assertion libraries
• Since Jest is an all-in-one tool, customizing or replacing parts of it is hard

Jest pricing

• Free to use as it’s open-sourced

Everything to Know About Mocha

What is Mocha?

Mocha is a feature-rich test runner for JavaScript, mainly used for backend testing in Node.js. It requires additional libraries to execute tests, such as:

• Chai: A separate assertion library for writing test conditions
• Sinon: A library for mocking, spying, and stubbing functions

This modularity gives developers more control over their test setups but also requires more configuration. Mocha runs tests sequentially, making debugging easier.

Mocha features

• Supports asynchronous testing by enabling you to use a special callback function (commonly named done) in your test cases
• Uses Emacs for testing by installing the third-party package mocha.el from MELPA via M-x package-install mocha
• Uses most JavaScript assertion libraries, including Express.js, unexpected, and better-assert
• Enables fine-tuning of test environments and adapts to different reporters dynamically
• Leverages assertion error properties (err.expected and err.actual) for better debugging
• Because it doesn’t enforce built-in mocking or coverage collection, it runs tests quickly
• Applies the Dot Matrix reporter for a minimal test summary

Best test scenarios for Mocha

Mocha is an excellent choice for complex in-browser and server-side testing. Let’s analyze its test scenarios.

1. CLI tool testing automation

If you’re developing a command-line (CLI) tool, Mocha is ideal for testing input/output behavior. Simulate user commands, verify that your CLI responses handle errors, and deliver expected results for different scenarios.

2. Database interaction testing

When working with databases, you often need to check that the data is written, retrieved, and deleted correctly. With Mocha, you can integrate database lifecycle hooks, such as defining test data before each test and cleaning up afterward. This makes it easier to test database-independent functionality without affecting production data.

3. Load testing and performance benchmarking

Using Mocha, you can set up performance tests to measure execution time and memory usage. This is particularly helpful where performance is a priority. You can identify bottlenecks in high-traffic apps, ensuring your system remains efficient despite high load.

Mocha challenges

• Requires defining and maintaining multiple dependencies, which can make setup inconsistent across projects
• Requires additional tools like ‘NYC’ or ‘Istanbul’ because it lacks built-in code coverage
• It doesn’t work out of the box and requires manual configuration
• Since it runs tests sequentially, large test suites may take longer

Mocha pricing

• Free to use as it’s open-sourced

Feature Comparison: Jest vs Mocha

Now that we know the capabilities of both tools, let’s find out how they compare against each other:

Feature	Jest	Mocha
Origin	2014	2011
Ease of use and setup	Works out of the box, minimal setup required	Requires additional libraries (Chai for assertions, Sinon for mocks)
Performance and speed	Runs tests in parallel, faster for large test suites but higher memory usage	Runs tests sequentially, slower but easier to debug
Built-in functionalities	Includes test runner, assertion library, mocking, and snapshot testing	Only a test runner; it requires external libraries for assertions and mocks
Asynchronous testing support	Built-in support for async/await, promises, and callback-based tests	Supports async/await and callbacks but requires calling `done()` for callback tests
Debugging experience	Parallel execution can make debugging harder	Sequential execution makes debugging simpler
Community support and ecosystem	Large and growing community, strong support for frontend testing	Well-established in backend testing, flexible but requires more setup

Who Wins the Jest vs Mocha Debate

The short answer is: it depends. 

If you’re looking for an all-in-one solution that helps you test React and frontend apps with minimal setup, go for Jest. However, Mocha is an ideal choice if you want control over test configurations and prefer a modular setup for greater flexibility.

So, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer to the Jest vs Mocha debate. First, find out what you want to achieve with testing, and then pick a framework that fits into your process.

If you want an AI-powered end-to-end testing platform, consider TestGrid, which supports web, mobile, and API testing. It simplifies real device testing by hosting 1,000+ mobile devices and browsers, including the latest sizes, versions, and resolutions on the cloud or on-premise.

From visual testing to cross-browser testing, you can check your apps on all aspects and deliver a superior user experience.

Start your free trial today to see how TestGrid can elevate software testing.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How do Jest and Mocha handle test retries?

Differently. Jest doesn’t have built-in support for test retirees and needs third-party turnarounds to achieve that. But Mocha supports retries with the ‘this.retries(n)’ technique. That means flaky tests can be rerun automatically.

2. Can Jest and Mocha be used together in the same project?

Yes, but it’s actually very uncommon. Jest is a self-contained framework. On the other hand, Mocha is modular. But if you want to benefit from both – Jest’s snapshot testing and Mocha’s flexibility for backend testing – you can configure both. However, maintaining separate test setups might not be worth your time and effort.

3. How does Jest vs Mocha test execution speed differ in CI/CD environments?

In this scenario, the speed depends on rapid feedback loops and faster deployments. While Jest’s parallel execution can speed up test runs, it consumes more memory. Mocha may be slower but is undoubtedly more stable in memory-constrained CI environments.

---